Letter to the Editor: Article Review Improving Oral Health in Pregnant Women: A Painting Drawing

Nowadays, one of the ways to evaluate the scientific development of any country is to evaluate the scientific activities of its researchers and hence, the study of scientific-research activities in each country is considered as a fundamental step towards achieving scientific goals. (1). For this reason, universities play a central role in advancing the scientific research of each country as a central core of science production (2). Failure to acquaint people with the benefits of proper future research and lack of attention to the proper way of doing scientific articles is one of the reasons that leads to a decline in the quality of scientific papers (3). To this end, increasing the quality of scientific articles is inevitable and inevitable. One way to evaluate the quality of scientific articles is to critique articles that help writers and readers identify ambiguous points in articles. Criticism is therefore made from a variety of perspectives, and critical thinking helps to examine issues of different dimensions and to make logical connections between them easier to understand (1). In other words, criticism of studies both in terms of writing and content enhances the level of research in the country and guides others to write studies correctly